Legal Situation: All ongoing proceedings against Rehnstroem, Krueger and Fintery Ltd

Published: 9 April 2026 · Updated: 12 April 2026 · Reading time: approx. 12 minutes

Overview: Ongoing proceedings

Total damages:
EUR 215,400
Criminal proceedings DE:
Public Prosecutor Hamburg, ref.: STR-2025-001 Active
Civil claim UK:
High Court London, Injured Party v Fintery, Krueger, Unyted Active
Criminal Complaint UK:
Action Fraud / City of London Police Filed
BaFin filing:
UNYT Token regulatory violations Planned
Defendants:
David Rehnstroem, Florian B.J. Krueger, Guido Abraham et al.
Legal representation DE:
Klaus G. Kerkhoff, Krefeld
Legal representation UK:
Clintons, London (Gareth Jones)

This page documents the complete legal situation in the alleged fraud case around David Rehnstroem, Florian Krueger and Fintery Ltd. The injured party is pursuing the case on multiple levels — criminally in Germany and the United Kingdom, civilly before the High Court in London, and on a regulatory level with BaFin. All statements below are based on documented evidence.

1. Criminal proceedings in Germany

Charges under German criminal law

OffenceProvisionSentencing range
Commercial fraud§ 263 (3) StGB6 months to 10 years imprisonment
Gang fraud§ 263 (5) StGB1 to 10 years imprisonment
Breach of trust§ 266 StGBUp to 5 years imprisonment
Suppression of evidence§ 274 StGBUp to 5 years imprisonment
Attempted fraud§§ 263, 22 StGBUp to 5 years imprisonment

Elements of fraud (§ 263 StGB)

Fraud under German law requires four objective and two subjective elements. According to the assessment of the injured party, all are fulfilled in the present case:

a) Deceptive act: The alleged defendants systematically deceived the injured party about the following facts: (1) Krueger is allegedly CEO of DEXPO.SPACE, (2) DEXPO.SPACE and Fintery Ltd are allegedly identical, (3) a team of 30–35 experts allegedly exists, (4) a merger with Onchain Technologies AG is allegedly imminent, (5) the commissioned services would actually be performed.

b) Error: The injured party was in the deception-induced error of working with the professional DEXPO.SPACE team. This error was maintained through 17 DEXPO mentions in Rehnstroem's messages.

c) Disposition of assets: Transfer of EUR 215,400 in tranches starting 27 March 2025.

d) Financial damage: EUR 215,400 — no consideration provided, Slack communication inactive from 25 April 2025, all milestones missed.

Core evidence: Lack of intent to perform
None of the essential questions from the tokenisation question catalogue (created by Baykal Colakoglu, DEXPO.SPACE) was put to the injured party by Krueger or Rehnstroem — although these would have been mandatory for a serious implementation.
Source: Document "001 Questions that should have been asked"

Measures requested at the Public Prosecutor's Office Hamburg

2. Civil proceedings in England & Wales

Bases of claim

ClaimAgainstAmount
Debt Claim (Money had and received)Fintery Ltd (1st Defendant)EUR 215,000
Fraudulent MisrepresentationFlorian Krueger (2nd Defendant)EUR 215,000 damages
Unjust Enrichment / Constructive TrustUnyted Ltd (3rd Defendant)EUR 215,000 restitution

The civil claim is based on three alternative grounds: first, a simple debt claim against Fintery Ltd (Money had and received); second, a damages claim against Krueger personally for fraudulent misrepresentation; and third, a restitutionary claim against Unyted Ltd, since the EUR 215,000 are alleged to have been transferred from Fintery to Unyted (Constructive Trust).

Requested protective measures

Freezing Order (Mareva Injunction): Due to flight risk and the risk of asset dissipation, a Worldwide Freezing Order is being applied for at the High Court. Krueger has residences in England, Turkey and Mallorca as well as a sailing boat.

UK proceedings to date

3 June 2025

Statutory Demand served on Fintery Ltd (payment demand of EUR 215,000)

4 July 2025

Clintons Letter Before Action to Krueger, Fintery and Unyted

7 July 2025

Draft Particulars of Claim completed (Injured Party v Fintery, Krueger, Unyted)

April 2026

Update of the claim with new evidence

3. Criminal prosecution in the United Kingdom

OffenceProvisionMaximum sentence
Fraud by false representationSection 2 Fraud Act 200610 years imprisonment
Fraud by abuse of positionSection 4 Fraud Act 200610 years imprisonment
TheftSection 1 Theft Act 19687 years imprisonment
Money LaunderingProceeds of Crime Act 200214 years imprisonment

Criminal prosecution in the United Kingdom is primarily directed against Florian Krueger, who is registered as Director of Fintery Ltd and Unyted Ltd in England. The "false representations" cover the same deceptive acts that are also the subject of the German criminal complaint.

4. Regulatory measures: BaFin filing (UNYT Token)

According to analysis by the injured party, the UNYT Token issued by Krueger via Unyted shows serious regulatory deficiencies:

Connection to the fraud case

According to information from the injured party and other investors, the EUR 3.6 million in UNYT funds have been used up. There is the alleged suspicion that the EUR 215,400 from the injured party was used to cover UNYT losses — instead of for the commissioned tokenisation services.

5. The defendants

Person / CompanyRoleAllegation
David RehnstroemOwner BUEHNENREIF Marketing, HamburgMain perpetrator: systematic deception, manipulation, suppression of evidence
Florian B.J. KruegerCEO Fintery Ltd / Unyted Ltd, Richmond UKMain perpetrator: fraud, breach of trust, false team representation
Guido Abrahamequitycom GmbH, GochAlleged co-perpetrator: 50% commissions from UNYT Token
Tijana TrifunovicProject Manager Dexpo.spaceProgramme management within deception structure
Saskia KurzbuchInside Sales / Content UnytedInvestor communication function
Dr. Maxine RoomInvestor Relations Dexpo.spaceExternal representation of value to investors
Jule KarffField Marketing UnytedOn-site investor approach
Medardas PuidokasAML & KYC Officer UnytedCompliance function despite obvious deficiencies
Alyona DovgosheyaCFO Unyted LtdFinancial control / use of investor funds

6. Evidence base

The injured party has an exceptionally extensive evidence base documenting the alleged fraud:

Written evidence

Video and audio evidence

Witnesses

7. Legal basis of this publication

This publication is protected by the fundamental right to freedom of expression (Art. 5 (1) German Basic Law) and the principles of permissible suspicion-based reporting (German Federal Court of Justice, VI ZR 95/17). All requirements are met:

The processing of personal data is based on Art. 6 (1) (f) GDPR (legitimate interests). The legitimate interest consists in warning potentially injured parties and enforcing one's own legal claims. The persons named have the opportunity to comment at any time.

Are you also affected?

Have you had experiences with David Rehnstroem, Florian Krueger, Fintery Ltd, Unyted Ltd, the UNYT Token or equitycom? Contact us — together, injured parties are stronger.

Get in touch →

8. Next steps

The injured party will implement the following measures in the coming weeks and months:

April 2026

Filing of Criminal Complaint with Action Fraud London

April 2026

Application for Freezing Order at the High Court

April 2026

BaFin filing regarding UNYT Token

May 2026

Formal initiation of High Court Proceedings

May 2026

Review of insolvency petition against Fintery Ltd

Ongoing

Update of this documentation with new developments

This page is regularly updated as new developments occur in the ongoing proceedings.