Right of Reply: Should the named persons or companies wish to provide a statement in reply, this will be published on this page after review.
Data Protection Notice (GDPR Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f): This publication contains personal data, the processing of which is based on the legitimate interest in clarifying an alleged fraud case and the public interest in information. Affected persons have the right to object to the processing of their data and the right to correct inaccurate information. Please direct inquiries to the contact address below. Personal data not required for documentation of facts will be removed immediately upon justified objection.
What happens when you trust someone – and that trust is systematically exploited?
On March 19, 2025, ████████ LTD transferred €215.400 to Fintery Ltd – for a tokenization project that was supposed to be implemented by an alleged team of 30–35 experts. A few weeks later, the Slack work channel was empty. Not a single employee was ever active. Not a single service was provided. What remained were WhatsApp messages full of promises – and an empty bank account.
This report documents exactly what happened. With exact quotations. With dates. With evidence that is currently with the Hamburg Prosecutor's Office and the High Court of Justice in London.
„von diesen jungs kriegen wir 100"
David Rehnström, WhatsApp, March 19, 2025 – referring to 100 million euros, on the day of the €215.400 transfer
I. Summary of Facts
Between October 2024 and March 2025, ████████ LTD, a Cypriot company under the management of M.H., was systematically induced by the accused David Rehnström and Florian Ben Johannes Krüger to transfer €215,400 for alleged tokenization services.
The accused are alleged to have committed a series of deceptive actions: Krüger was presented as the CEO of the DEXPO.Space platform, although he later claimed to have nothing to do with DEXPO.Space. A team of 30–35 experts was claimed – in fact, the Slack work channel was empty from the start of the project. A merger with Swiss Onchain Technologies AG was suggested, whose representative Florian Ehrbar later confirmed having no knowledge of this. To this day, none of the promised services have been delivered – and despite multiple requests from the injured party, no settlement, partial performance, or compromise has ever been offered.
A subsequent investigative analysis of the UNYT Token from Krüger's UNYTED LIMITED revealed significant regulatory shortfalls and a possible motive for the actions: The token shows 0 transfers on the blockchain and only 1 holder, FCA registration is missing, and complaints have been filed with BaFin, FCA, FMA, and ESMA. The injured party believes it is possible that the €215,400 was used to cover pressing problems in the UNYTED group (→ Motive Analysis).
(DE + UK)
II. In Their Own Words
The following quotes come from secured WhatsApp messages, a recorded Zoom call, and an interview published on YouTube. All originals are available to the relevant authorities.
The Promises – Before Payment
„Baykal der business developer bei Dexpo ist interessiert an dein Projekt. Wann können wir uns zwecks Termin abstimmen?" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 09.12.2024 – the first contact with DEXPO.Space
„Habe mit dem ceo von Dexpo gesprochen und ein paar neue Erkenntnisse gewonnen die ich gerne mit dir teilen will" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 23.01.2025 – Krüger referred to as CEO of DEXPO.Space
„Baykal ist sehr angetan von dir, redet mit florian über dich in höchsten Tönen. Er will dich langfristig dabei haben." David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 25.01.2025 – flattery as a tool
„Habe übrigens beim fortschrittsupdate mit dem ceo von dexpo über dein projekt mit Andrew gesprochen und er hat seeeehr viele kontakte in dem Segment" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.02.2025 – the illusion of a functioning organization
The Promises – On the Day of Payment
„florian hat gestaffelte Zahlungen vorgeschlagen damit keine zu grosse Hürden von seiner Bank aufgestellt wird. Er denkt an ‚Häppchen' à 50k, gestaffelt. Dann triggert man keine Warnungen" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – recommendation to bypass bank controls
„Im Moment kaum etwas weil ich meine Zeit in dexpo und ████████ stecke." David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – confirms his DEXPO activity on the day of payment
„und du Kaviar mit Bill Gates schlürfst" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025, 17:50 – message immediately after payment confirmation
„wenn die ████████ Miro Fond 4 Milliarden wert ist" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – unrealistic promises to motivate payment
The Cover-Up – After Discovery
On June 17, 2025, M.H. confronted Rehnström in a recorded Zoom call with the accusations. The answers speak for themselves:
„Ich habe keine Täuschung" David Rehnström, recorded Zoom call, 17.06.2025
„Ich auch. Bis ich herausgefunden habe dass das frei erfunden war von Baykal. Dann habe ich dir das ja gesagt" David Rehnström, recorded Zoom call, 17.06.2025 – claims he himself was deceived
„mach was du willst" David Rehnström, recorded Zoom call, 17.06.2025 – response to the demand for reimbursement
„M., Bitte hör auf jetzt. Du benimmst dich verrückt" David Rehnström, recorded Zoom call, 17.06.2025 – gaslighting instead of answers
And in response to a renewed clear demand for repayment:
„dann do your thing" David Rehnström, recorded Zoom call, 17.06.2025 – final refusal of any cooperation
The Scale of Damages
„215.000 € sind durch dich mein finanzieller Schaden durch deine Täuschungshandlung" M.H. in the same Zoom call, 17.06.2025
Krüger's Public Self-Presentation
„das ist Florian Krüger, der ist CEO von Dexpo space" David Rehnström, YouTube interview "DEXPO Space Krüger Rehnström Interview" – Krüger does not contradict this
In the author's view, the sequence of quotes shows a typical pattern: effusive promises before payment, followed by complete passivity afterward, and finally aggressive rejection of any responsibility when confronted. According to the author's assessment, this behavior is not consistent with a misunderstanding, but rather suggests a systematic approach.
III. Promises vs. Reality
The following comparison is based on documented statements from the accused and verifiable reality:
Team of 30–35 experts worldwide (Bali, Belgrade, Seville)
Empty Slack channel. Not a single team member ever active.
Merger with Onchain Technologies AG (Switzerland), Florian Ehrbar as Smart Contract Expert
Ehrbar confirmed: He knew nothing about the use of his name.
Krüger = CEO of DEXPO.Space (17× in WhatsApp, YouTube interview, imprint)
Krüger subsequently claims to have nothing to do with DEXPO.Space.
"von diesen jungs kriegen wir 100" – 100 million euros through tokenization
€0 revenue. €0 tokens created. €0 reimbursed.
Reference projects with Sparkasse and BMW
None of the cited references could be verified.
IV. The Accused
David Rehnström
- Business Address: Hamburg, Germany (commercial register entry available)
- Role: Intermediary, Trusted Contact of the Injured Party
- Allegation: Fraud pursuant to §263 StGB through active deception
- 🔗 LinkedIn (UNYTED) 🔗 LinkedIn (Stage) 📷 Instagram 📷 Bühnenreif Instagram 🌐 buehnenreif.marketing 🔗 Facebook 𝕏 X / Twitter
Florian Ben Johannes Krüger
- Business Address: Surrey, England (Companies House Officer Records available)
- Email: florian@fintery.com
- Role: Recipient of Payments, Presented as CEO of DEXPO.Space
- Allegation: Fraud, breach of trust, potential money laundering
- 🔗 LinkedIn 🏛 Companies House UK 📈 North Data Profile 👥 The Org
V. Involved Companies
The following company network shows the interconnections of the accused. Sources: Companies House UK, North Data.
Companies Directly Involved in the Case
Fintery Ltd
Companies House Nr.: 16093636
Registered Office: Elm Crescent, Canbury Works Units 6&7, Kingston Upon Thames KT2 6HJ, Surrey
Managing Director: Florian Ben Johannes Krüger
Registration: 21.11.2024 | Status: Active
Invoice issuer for €250,000 (of which €215,400 paid)
UNYTED Ltd
Companies House Nr.: 14046174
Registered Office: Kingston Upon Thames, England
Managing Director: Florian Krüger | Registration: 13.04.2022
Recipient of the forwarded €215,400 according to the particulars of claim
UNYTED World GmbH
HRB: 23258 (Amtsgericht Neuss)
Registered Office: Neuss, Deutschland
Managing Director: Florian Krüger | Registration: 26.07.2023
German sister company of UNYTED Ltd
DEXPO.Space
Imprint until 10.06.2025: Fintery Ltd, CEO: Florian Krüger
Tokenization platform through which the project was to be conducted
BUEHNENREIF Marketing
Owner: David Rehnström
Registered Office: Hamburg, Deutschland
Video marketing agency of David Rehnström
████████ LTD
Registered Office: [Location protected]
Managing Director: M.H.
Injured party, plaintiff
Additional Companies of Florian Ben Johannes Krüger
Source: Companies House UK – Appointments, North Data
Craft Coin Company UK Ltd
Companies House Nr.: 12292511
Managing Director: Florian Krüger | Registration: 31.10.2019
Status: Dissolved
Krueger & Partner Limited
Companies House Nr.: 09673617
Managing Director: Florian Krüger | Registration: 07.07.2015
Status: Dissolved
Igniter100 UK Ltd
Companies House Nr.: 10920141
Managing Director: Florian Krüger | 17.05.2018 – 01.02.2021
Status: Resigned
Energydeck Ltd
Companies House Nr.: 07826977
Managing Director: Florian Krüger | 27.10.2015 – 30.04.2017
Status: Resigned
VI. Timeline of Events
The following timeline is based on WhatsApp messages, emails, and contract documents, all of which have been secured as evidence and submitted to the competent authorities.
Fintery Ltd is listed in the imprint of DEXPO.Space as the responsible entity. Florian Krüger is named as CEO. Initial discussions about tokenization with Baykal Colakoglu as the contact person for DEXPO.Space.
David Rehnström makes the connection to DEXPO.Space:
„Baykal der business developer bei Dexpo ist interessiert an dein Projekt. Wann können wir uns zwecks Termin abstimmen?" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 09.12.2024
Rehnström forwards tokenization material from "Dexpo". M.H. asks: "how much does it cost to create the token at Dexpo?" – an indication that he perceives DEXPO.Space as the contracting party.
Rehnström deepens the illusion of a large, professional organization:
„Soll ich Andrew in eine Gruppe reintun mit florian Baykal etc und dir und wir machen so einen Tag aus" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 22.01.2025
„Habe mit dem ceo von Dexpo gesprochen und ein paar neue Erkenntnisse gewonnen die ich gerne mit dir teilen will" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 23.01.2025
„Baykal ist sehr angetan von dir, redet mit florian über dich in höchsten Tönen. Er will dich langfristig dabei haben." David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 25.01.2025
Rehnström writes a message that proves he is acting as an intermediary between M.H. and DEXPO.Space:
„████████, willst du mit deiner ████████ email oder ████@████.██ in deinen DEXPO Space einloggen? Wird gerade scharf geschaltet von Arnie" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 31.01.2025
Krüger is again referred to as CEO of DEXPO.Space:
„Habe übrigens beim fortschrittsupdate mit dem ceo von dexpo über dein projekt mit Andrew gesprochen und er hat seeeehr viele kontakte in dem Segment" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.02.2025
Rehnström sends a proposal (Proposal 0.2) bearing the DEXPO logo, written by "Florian and David" and providing the address of Fintery Ltd. The imprint of DEXPO.Space continues to name Fintery Ltd and Krüger as CEO.
M.H. writes to 22 minority shareholders of Miro Forestry and mentions cooperation with the "Dexpo team" and its CEO. He links to the page dexpo.space/tokenisation/.
Payment of €215,400 in multiple tranches to Fintery Ltd. A day full of promises and pressure:
„florian hat gestaffelte Zahlungen vorgeschlagen damit keine zu grosse Hürden von seiner Bank aufgestellt wird. Er denkt an ‚Häppchen' à 50k, gestaffelt. Dann triggert man keine Warnungen" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – Recommendation to circumvent bank controls
„Im Moment kaum etwas weil ich meine Zeit in dexpo und ████████ stecke." David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – Confirms his DEXPO involvement on payment day
„von diesen jungs kriegen wir 100" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – Claimed 100 million euros in potential
„und du Kaviar mit Bill Gates schlürfst" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025, 17:50 – Immediately after payment confirmation
Krüger sends a "Let's Go" email, presenting an alleged team – including Florian Ehrbar of Onchain Technologies, who later confirmed he knew nothing about it.
The day after payment, Rehnström reveals the actual strategy:
„Florian hat mir gestern eine E-Mail gezeigt von einer Freundin die eine Community für ein investmentunternehmen leitet. Sie hat eine neue opportunity präsentiert und am nächsten Tag hat sie geschrieben und sich bedankt, alle Anteile wurden schon gekauft." David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 20.03.2025
„Da wollen wir hin. So viel Trust bauen dass Anleger alles kaufen was wir herausbringen" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 20.03.2025 – The strategy: Build "trust" to move investors to buy
Kickoff meeting in London. An alleged merger with Onchain Technologies AG is presented. Florian Ehrbar gives a presentation. The meeting remains superficial in substance – no concrete work products are produced.
M.H. is alone in the project's Slack workspace. Despite claims of a team of 30–35 people, no other employee is active.
The deception is uncovered. Baykal Colakoglu clarifies to M.H. in Dubai that DEXPO.Space and Fintery are not the same company and that Krüger is not the CEO of DEXPO.Space.
████████ serves a Statutory Demand on Fintery Ltd for €215,000. Fintery denies the claim and asserts a counterclaim of approximately €70,000.
The London law firm Clintons completes the Particulars of Claim for the English High Court. Defendants: Fintery Ltd, Florian Krüger, and UNYTED Ltd.
Attorney Klaus G. Kerkhoff (Krefeld) files a criminal complaint with the Hamburg public prosecutor's office for commercial fraud pursuant to §263 StGB in conjunction with §263 Abs. 5 StGB.
VII. The Documented Acts of Deception
1. False Representation of Krüger as CEO of DEXPO.Space
In at least 17 WhatsApp messages between December 2024 and March 2025, Rehnström mentioned "DEXPO" or "Dexpo" in connection with the project, without ever communicating a separation between DEXPO.Space and Fintery. Rehnström repeatedly referred to Krüger as "CEO of Dexpo".
„das ist Florian Krüger, der ist CEO von Dexpo space" David Rehnström, YouTube Interview – Krüger does not contradict throughout the interview and instead describes his alleged tasks at DEXPO.Space
The imprint of the website dexpo.space listed "Fintery Ltd" as the responsible company and "Florian Krüger" as CEO until at least June 10, 2025.
2. Fictitious Team of 30–35 People
In the YouTube interview, Krüger claimed to have a globally distributed team of 30–35 people, with locations in Bali, Belgrade, and Seville. He cited reference projects with Sparkasse and BMW.
The reality: After project start on March 19, 2025, the Slack workspace was empty starting April 25, 2025. Not a single one of the alleged team members was active. On March 16, 2025, Rehnström had introduced a team by name via WhatsApp, including a "Tijana Trifunovic, the best project manager". None of these team members ever appeared.
In his "Let's Go" email from March 19, 2025 – the day of payment – Florian Krüger presented the following team by name to the injured party. According to the email, these people were to be "reachable by email and Slack starting Monday". None of these team members ever worked on the project. The Slack channel remained empty.
Apart from Florian Ehrbar (Onchain Technologies AG, whose name was used without his knowledge), all named persons are employees of UNYTED Ltd – a company under the leadership of Florian Krüger.
Summary: Krüger presented his own UNYTED staff to the injured party as a dedicated project team. This created the impression that a professional team would immediately work exclusively on the tokenization project. In reality, none of these team members ever performed any work for the project. The Slack workspace remained empty from project start.
Criminal Classification: Suspicion of Organized and Commercial Fraud
Note: The following classification reflects the legal assessment of the injured party. All named persons are presumed innocent pursuant to Art. 6(2) ECHR. The final criminal assessment is the sole responsibility of the competent law enforcement authorities and courts. This presentation serves to document the facts and inform the public within the scope of freedom of expression (Art. 5(1) GG).
In light of the overall circumstances, from the perspective of the injured party there is reasonable suspicion that the underlying conduct could meet the elements of organized and commercial fraud pursuant to § 263 Abs. 5 StGB. This qualification requires that at least three persons have entered into an agreement for the repeated commission of fraud (band conspiracy) and act with the intention of securing a continued source of income through repeated criminal conduct (commercial operation).
The following facts support this assessment:
1. Multiple Perpetrators (Organized Structure)
In the "Let's Go" email from March 19, 2025, Florian Krüger presented eight people by name to the injured party as a project team. Six of these people are demonstrably employees of UNYTED Ltd, whose director is also Florian Krüger. None of these people ever performed any work for the project. Naming them to the injured party created the impression of a professional, ready-to-deploy team and was suitable to reinforce the injured party's error in believing he would receive consideration for his payment.
2. Physical Meeting on April 14, 2025 in London
On April 14, 2025, a so-called "Kickoff Meeting" took place in London, at which several of the people named in the email were physically present. In this meeting, the injured party was presented with an alleged merger with Swiss Onchain Technologies AG, a collaboration that, according to later statements by Florian Ehrbar (Onchain Technologies), never existed. The physical presence of multiple perpetrators at an event in which the injured party was demonstrably presented with false facts is, from the perspective of the injured party, strong evidence of coordinated, division-of-labor conduct.
3. Commercial Operation
Rehnström stated in a WhatsApp message from March 19, 2025 – the day of payment – that he wanted to get "100" (million) from investors. This suggests that the scheme was not limited to a single crime but was designed as a repeatable and scalable business model. Additionally, Rehnström confirmed in the same context that he was investing his time "in dexpo and ████████", demonstrating his ongoing involvement in the crime.
4. Legal Consequences
If the allegations are substantiated, those involved face a sentence of one to ten years imprisonment (§ 263 Abs. 5 StGB). Upon conviction under this classification, this constitutes a felony in the sense of § 12 Abs. 1 StGB – no longer a mere misdemeanor.
To all persons named in the "Let's Go" email: Whoever participates in actions taken by a group that are suitable to cause or maintain an error on the part of the injured party may be liable under German criminal law for aiding and abetting fraud (§§ 263, 27 StGB) or – depending on the nature of participation – for joint perpetration (§ 25 Abs. 2 StGB). This applies regardless of whether the individual has directly profited financially. Participation in the deceptive conduct alone – such as merely providing one's name and title in a fictitious project team – can satisfy the elements of aiding and abetting, provided there is at least conditional intent regarding the principal offense.
3. The Equitycom Connection: 3.6 Million Euros and 50% Commission
Behind the failed UNYT token project stands another actor: Guido Abraham, Managing Director of equitycom GmbH (HRB 140100, AG Frankfurt a. M.; Registered Office: Thurn- und Taxis-Platz 6, 60313 Frankfurt; Managing Director: Guido Arno Erich Herbert Abraham; Share Capital: 25,000 €; Business Purpose per Commercial Register: "Consultation of capital companies with a view to stock market orientation"). Previous Address: Auf dem Wall 6, 47574 Goch). According to available information, approximately 3.6 million euros were raised for the UNYT token project via Equitycom – at a 50% commission to Equitycom.
The fact that the UNYT token project had already consumed 3.6 million euros without demonstrating a functioning product allows the author, in his assessment, to conclude that new investor funds – such as the €215,400 from ████████ LTD – were primarily used to cover existing losses and not to provide services. The MLM-like commission structure (50% to Equitycom) contradicts a legitimate business model.
4. Evidence Tampering – §274 StGB
Following the emergence of fraud allegations, evidence was systematically destroyed:
The deletion of the YouTube channel following the emergence of allegations constitutes, in the author's assessment, evidence tampering pursuant to § 274 StGB. The destruction of incriminating video evidence – particularly the interview in which Rehnström publicly presented Krüger as DEXPO CEO – suggests awareness that this material documented the criminal conduct.
5. Fictitious Merger with Onchain Technologies AG
In the "Let's Go" email from March 19, 2025 and in the Kickoff Meeting on April 14, 2025, a collaboration or merger with Swiss Onchain Technologies AG was presented. Florian Ehrbar was presented as "Smart Contract Expert & Data Visualisation".
6. Staggered Payments to Circumvent Bank Controls
On March 19, 2025, Rehnström recommended via WhatsApp a staggered payment structure that, in the author's assessment, was designed to circumvent bank controls:
„florian hat gestaffelte Zahlungen vorgeschlagen damit keine zu grosse Hürden von seiner Bank aufgestellt wird. Er denkt an ‚Häppchen' à 50k, gestaffelt. Dann triggert man keine Warnungen" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025
The recommendation of staggered payments to circumvent bank controls is, in the author's assessment, strong evidence that the accused knew the transaction would raise suspicion under normal bank scrutiny. Legitimate business partners have no reason to conceal payment receipts from their own bank.
7. Unrealistic Promises and Emotional Manipulation
Rehnström deliberately used emotional triggers to move M.H. to pay and to keep him motivated:
„und du Kaviar mit Bill Gates schlürfst" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025, 17:50 – Immediately after M.H. confirmed the payment
„von diesen jungs kriegen wir 100" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 19.03.2025 – 100 million euros were promised
„Da wollen wir hin. So viel Trust bauen dass Anleger alles kaufen was wir herausbringen" David Rehnström, WhatsApp, 20.03.2025 – The declared strategy one day after payment
8. Forwarding of Funds to UNYTED Ltd
According to the Particulars of Claim for the English High Court, Fintery Ltd forwarded the €215,400 to UNYTED Ltd per Krüger's instructions. UNYTED Ltd (Companies House No. 14046174) is also connected to Krüger. The whereabouts of the funds is unclear.
The forwarding of the entire payment to another company of the same director raises, in the author's assessment, substantial questions regarding possible asset shifting. A legitimate service provider would have used the funds project-related – not transferred them to a sister company.
VIII. Overview of Evidence
| Evidence | Content | Evidentiary Value |
|---|---|---|
| WhatsApp correspondence Rehnström/M.H. | 17 DEXPO mentions without separation; payment modalities; team claims | Documents the ongoing deception |
| YouTube Interview "DEXPO Space" | Rehnström introduces Krüger as CEO; Krüger does not contradict | Publicly accessible proof of false representation |
| Proposal 0.2 (02.03.2025) | DEXPO logo, written by "Florian and David", Fintery address | Mixing of DEXPO/Fintery to deceive |
| Proposal 1.0 (19.03.2025) | Fintery logo, same content, basis of invoice | Logo exchange without customer notification |
| "Let's Go" Email Krüger (19.03.2025) | Fictitious team including F. Ehrbar; project start communication | Direct deception on day of payment |
| Recorded Zoom Call (17.06.2025) | Rehnström: "I haven't deceived anyone", "do what you want", "you're acting crazy" | Documents refusal and gaslighting |
| Imprint dexpo.space (until 10.06.2025) | Fintery Ltd as operator, Krüger as CEO | Web archive-secured deception foundation |
| Emails to Miro shareholders (11.03.2025) | M.H. mentions "Dexpo CEO" and "Dexpo team" | Shows M.H.'s good faith perception before payment |
| Slack Log (from 25.04.2025) | Empty workspace despite claimed 30-person team | Refutes team claims |
| Statement by Florian Ehrbar | Confirms misuse of name in proposals | Proves fictitious merger with Onchain Technologies |
| Recorded Conversation (17.06.2025) | Krüger: Rehnström said ████████ offers no refund | Shows coordination to avoid repayment |
VIII½. Questions That Were Never Asked — The Central Proof of Fraud
The complete absence of any technical questions is, in the author's view, the strongest single piece of evidence of fraudulent intent from the beginning. An external consultant identified over 131 questions that absolutely needed to be clarified within a few days — Krüger and his alleged team of 30-35 experts did not ask even a single one on any single channel (email, WhatsApp, Slack, telephone).
The argument is simple: Even if Krüger had wanted to deliver the service, it would have been simply impossible without this information. Whoever never asks, never plans to deliver.
The Tile Layer Analogy
Imagine you hire a tile layer to tile your bathroom. He gives you a quote for 12,000 €. You pay upfront. Then: nothing happens. And you realize: he never asked a single question beforehand.
Every serious tile layer asks this.
Krüger did not ask a single question.
A tile layer who never asks how large the bathroom is —
und trotzdem 12.000 € kassiert:
This ist Betrug.
Krüger übernahm ein internationales tokenization project über 22.000 Hektar
in two African countries with four jurisdictions —
kassierte 215.400 € — und stellte null Fragen.
Nicht per E-Mail. Nicht per WhatsApp. Nicht per Slack. Nicht telefonisch.
A complete search of all available communication channels between the client and Krüger/team reveals:
For comparison: An independent external consultant identified within a few days over 131 points requiring clarification — structured in three project phases, twelve specialist areas, and nine launchpad categories.
The Complete Question Catalog — What Should Have Been Asked
Below is the systematic catalog of all technical questions, divided into three project phases. Not a single one of these questions was ever asked.
Conclusion: The Arithmetic of Fraud
Back to the tile layer: A tile layer who does not ask 15 mandatory questions for an 8-m² bathroom cannot tile. This is obvious. Krüger übernahm ein internationales tokenization project mit 22.000 Hektar Plantagenfläche in zwei afrikanischen Ländern, bestehenden institutionellen Investoren (BII, Finnfund, DFI Canada), komplexen regulatorischen Anforderungen in vier Jurisdiktionen — und stellte nicht eine einzige the 131 necessary technical questions. Nicht per E-Mail. Nicht per WhatsApp. Nicht per Slack. Nicht telefonisch.
Either the team was incapable at a level that falls below every professional minimum standard — or from the beginning there was never the intention to deliver the promised performance. In both cases, 215,400 € were collected under false pretenses. This is fraud under § 263 StGB.
IX. Ongoing Proceedings
Criminal Proceedings – Germany
Authority: Hamburg Public Prosecutor
Filed: July 14, 2025 by RA Klaus G. Kerkhoff, Krefeld
Charges:
- Commercial fraud pursuant to Section 263 German Criminal Code, possibly in a criminal organization pursuant to Section 263 Para. 5 German Criminal Code
- Breach of trust pursuant to Section 266 German Criminal Code (misappropriation of funds for UNYT losses)
- Obstruction of evidence pursuant to Section 274 German Criminal Code (deletion of YouTube channel)
- Possibly money laundering pursuant to Section 261 German Criminal Code (concealment of fund usage)
Sentencing range: Particularly serious case: 6 months to 10 years; for criminal organization (felony): 1 to 10 years
Status: Filed
Civil Proceedings – England & Wales
Authority: High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts, Business List (ChD)
Law firm: Clintons, London (Solicitor: Gareth Jones)
Plaintiff: ████████ LTD
Defendants: Fintery Ltd (1st Defendant), Florian Krüger (2nd Defendant), UNYTED Ltd (3rd Defendant)
Claims:
- €215,000 as debt against Fintery Ltd
- Alternatively: €215,000 damages for misrepresentation against Krüger personally
- Further alternatively: €215,000 restitution for unjust enrichment (Constructive Trust) against UNYTED Ltd
- Interest pursuant to Section 35A Senior Courts Act 1981
Status: Statement of claim served
X. Response of the Accused
David Rehnström's Defense
In an email dated June 5, 2025, Rehnström emphasized his friendship with M.H. and denied any intent to deceive. He claimed to have informed M.H. in a timely manner about the alleged separation of DEXPO.Space and Fintery, and blamed Baykal Colakoglu for the confusion.
In the recorded telephone call on June 17, 2025, Rehnström contradicted himself:
„Ich auch. Bis ich herausgefunden habe dass das frei erfunden war von Baykal. Dann habe ich dir das ja gesagt" David Rehnström, recorded telephone call, 06.17.2025 – claims to be a victim himself
In the author's assessment, this defense is not convincing, as:
- Rehnström himself introduced Krüger in the YouTube interview as "CEO of Dexpo Space" – this was not a claim by Baykal, but Rehnström's own words on camera.
- Rehnström personally sent the Proposal 0.2 with DEXPO logo to M.H.
- M.H. still spoke on March 11, 2025 – just days before the payment – to 22 Miro shareholders about cooperation with the "Dexpo CEO," which he would not have done if he had been informed of a separation.
- Rehnström confirmed via WhatsApp on March 19, 2025 – the day of payment – that he was investing his time "in dexpo and ████████".
Confronted with the concrete damage amount of €215,000, Rehnström did not respond with regret or settlement offers, but with defensiveness:
„M., Bitte hör auf jetzt. Du benimmst dich verrückt" David Rehnström, recorded telephone call, 06.17.2025
„mach was du willst" David Rehnström, recorded telephone call, 06.17.2025
„dann do your thing" David Rehnström, recorded telephone call, 06.17.2025 – the final refusal
Florian Krüger's Defense
Krüger claimed in an email to RA Kerkhoff on June 6, 2025 that DEXPO.Space had been "excluded" and that M.H. was satisfied with the project. He also claimed that M.H. deleted Rehnström's ████████ email account to destroy evidence.
This defense also appears unconvincing to the author:
- If Krüger had nothing to do with DEXPO.Space, why was his company Fintery listed in the imprint as operator until June 2025 and he himself as CEO?
- Why did he not contradict being presented as "CEO of Dexpo Space" in the YouTube interview?
- The deletion of the email account demonstrably occurred on April 30, 2025, after M.H. learned of the deception – thus as a reaction to the deception, not to conceal it.
- All relevant WhatsApp messages, emails, and documents are secured and have been submitted to authorities.
XI. Key Contradictions
| Claim by the Accused | Actual Evidence |
|---|---|
| Krüger was never CEO of DEXPO.Space | YouTube interview: Rehnström introduces him as CEO; imprint until 06.10.2025 lists him as CEO; Krüger contradicts nowhere |
| M.H. was informed of the separation in a timely manner | M.H. still spoke on 03.11.2025 to 22 people about "Dexpo CEO"; clarification first on 04.30.2025 by a third party |
| A team of 30–35 experts existed | Slack channel empty from project start; not a single team member ever active |
| Merger with Onchain Technologies existed | Florian Ehrbar (Onchain) confirms: knew nothing of being mentioned |
| Email deletion served to destroy evidence | All evidence (WhatsApp, emails, proposals) secured and submitted to authorities |
| Baykal was solely responsible for the deception | Rehnström himself introduced Krüger as CEO; proposal with DEXPO logo came from Rehnström and Krüger |
| "I committed no deception" | 17 DEXPO messages, YouTube interview, proposal with DEXPO logo, own statement "my time in dexpo" on payment day |
XII. Motive Analysis: Why Was No Performance Ever Delivered?
A central question runs through this entire case: Why, despite a payment of €215,400, was not a single performance delivered – and why was there never a settlement offer, partial offer, or even an attempt at a compromise solution?
The injured party, upon learning of the problems, repeatedly made active contact and repeatedly signaled willingness to discuss. Clarification was requested, partial performances were sought, an amicable solution was pursued – whether in the form of a refund, installment payment, partial performance, or settlement. All attempts met with no substantive response. Instead, there followed defensiveness, silence, and finally the ultimate refusal: "mach was du willst," "then do your thing".
This behavior is remarkable in that it contradicts any normal business practice. Even in failed projects or disputes, a minimum level of cooperation – at least an attempt at settlement – is the rule. The complete absence of any cooperation suggests that performance delivery was never intended from the beginning.
Possible Motive: The UNYT Token Crisis
An investigative research into the UNYT Token of UNYTED LIMITED – whose sole Director is Florian Ben Johannes Krüger – has uncovered a possible motive for the actions documented here. The complete on-chain analysis shows:
- The UNYT Token on the Binance Smart Chain has 0 Transfers and only 1 Holder – no investor has ever received a token
- There is no FCA registration and no demonstrable MiCAR approval, although an "EU Crypto Licence" is claimed
- The ScamAdviser Trust Score for unyted.world is 0 out of 100
- The Floin Exchange listing was removed (HTTP 404)
- Krüger's previous crypto company CRAFT COIN COMPANY UK LTD was dissolved
- Complaints were filed with BaFin, FCA, FMA Liechtenstein, and ESMA
It is conceivable – expressed explicitly as opinion and not as proven fact – that the €215,400 from the injured party may not have been intended for the promised tokenization services, but rather served to address urgent problems related to the UNYT Token: such as remedying regulatory deficiencies, servicing existing investor claims, or simply filling financial gaps that had arisen.
This hypothesis would explain why:
- No performance was ever delivered – the funds may have been needed for other purposes from the outset
- No compromise, no settlement, no partial performance was offered – because the money may have been spent elsewhere
- The response to inquiries was purely defensive – "mach was du willst" – because an honest answer would have revealed the actual use of funds
- David Rehnström played a key role as intermediary – he made the contact, promoted the project, and enabled the money flow, while simultaneously serving as "Entrepreneur in Residence" at UNYTED
Note: This represents the personal assessment and opinion of the injured party. The actual use of funds can only be clarified by the investigating authorities. The presumption of innocence applies. The named persons have the opportunity to comment on these questions.
The Dual Role of David Rehnström
A central aspect that must be considered in this context is David Rehnström's dual role. At the time of the events documented here, Rehnström was not only the intermediary who introduced the injured party to Florian Krüger – he was simultaneously working as "Entrepreneur in Residence" at UNYTED, meaning he was directly embedded within Krüger's corporate sphere.
This raises the following questions, which have remained unanswered to date:
- Did Rehnström have knowledge of the regulatory problems of the UNYT Token – the missing FCA registration, the non-existent MiCAR approval?
- Was Rehnström aware that the UNYT Token on the blockchain has no real activity (0 Transfers, 1 Holder)?
- Was Rehnström possibly deliberately deployed to access new sources of funds for the UNYTED group through his network?
- Why did Rehnström never offer to mediate for damage mitigation, despite having close contact with both sides?
These questions are not to be understood as accusations, but as open points whose clarification is the responsibility of the investigating authorities. The constellation – Rehnström as intermediary of the €215,400 transaction while simultaneously working for UNYTED – nonetheless forms, in the author's view, an overall picture that warrants careful examination.
Author's Assessment: Upon evaluating all facts, the injured party has reached the conclusion that the €215,400 was not intended from the beginning for the promised tokenization services. The complete refusal of any cooperation, any compromise, and any partial performance – despite repeated inquiries – can be best explained, in the injured party's view, by the funds being used elsewhere immediately upon receipt, making repayment or performance delivery factually impossible. The UNYT Token analysis provides a possible context for this use of funds. Final clarification rests with the competent investigating authorities.
XIII. The UNYTED Team: Who Was Involved?
A central aspect of this case is the question of who within the UNYTED/Fintery structure was involved in the deception – knowingly or unknowingly. The following analysis is based on the official team page of unyted.space (archived July 14, 2025), the Fintery website, and documents from the Kick-Off Workshop of April 14–15, 2025 in London.
The Official UNYTED Team According to the Website
UNYTED LIMITED presented an extensive team on its website (unyted.world/en/team/). According to its own representations, UNYTED was founded in 2022 by Gaby K Slezák and Florian Krüger. The company advertised values of "diversity, inclusion and freedom" and presented the following people:
| Name | Position at UNYTED | Position at Fintery | Relevance to This Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florian Krüger | CEO & Founder | CEO | Primary accused. Sole Director of Fintery Ltd, UNYTED Ltd, DEXPO Space Ltd, and 3 other UK companies. |
| David Rehnström | — | Entrepreneur in Residence | Intermediary of the €215,400 transaction. Listed on the Fintery team page, not on the UNYTED page. Filmed recordings at the Kick-Off Meeting on 04.14.2025. |
| Gaby K Slezák | Co-Founder | — | Co-founder of UNYTED. Role in operational business unclear. |
| Dr. Maxine Room CBE | Head of People Operations & Advisory Board | — | Was announced at the Kick-Off Workshop on 04.14.2025 as "Investor Relations" expert. |
| Alyona Dovhosheia | CFO | — | Named as "Financial Support" for the tokenization project. Alleged CFO of a company with 0 token transfers. |
| Tijana Trifunovic | Production Manager | Head of Project Management | Was introduced to the injured party as "the best project manager you've ever met." Appeared at the Kick-Off. Changing Job Titles: "Production Manager" (UNYTED) vs. "Head of Project Management" (Fintery). |
| Saskia Kurzbuch | Marketing & Sales Content Creator | Head of Sales | Appeared at the Kick-Off. Changing Job Titles: "Content Creator" (UNYTED) vs. "Head of Sales" (Fintery). Took notes and handled admin. |
| Julieta Waisfeld | Executive Assistant, HR, Finance | — | According to the website, held multiple administrative roles simultaneously. |
| Chloé Hernandez | Customer Success Manager | — | According to the website, responsible for customer satisfaction. The on-chain data of the UNYT Token shows 0 Transfers. |
| Aleksandar Saponjac | Unity Developer | — | Developer for virtual 3D worlds – not for blockchain or token programming. |
| Yusuf Metindoğan | Unity Developer | — | Second Unity developer. No blockchain expertise apparent. |
| Shiza Arslan | Fullstack Developer | — | Only person with potential web/blockchain proximity. |
Advisory Board
| Name | Role | Claimed Background |
|---|---|---|
| Victor Llorens | Advisory Board | No publicly verifiable information |
| Andreas Kunz | Advisory Board | Managing Director, Connecting Media GmbH |
| Zafar Karim | Advisory Board | Claims: Rothschild, Salomon Brothers, Oxford, Cambridge |
| Saqib Rizvi | Advisory Board – VP of Sales | Claims: "Unicorn" Nasdaq IPO, 20+ years tech experience |
The Kick-Off Meeting on April 14–15, 2025 in London
On April 14 and 15, 2025, a Kick-Off Workshop took place at Canbury Works, Kingston Upon Thames (the registered seat of UNYTED LIMITED). This meeting is of central importance to the investigation for several reasons:
📹 David Rehnström filmed the meeting
Rehnström walked around during the entire Kick-Off Workshop with a camera and made video recordings. This material would be of considerable interest to the investigating authorities, as it documents which persons were present and what representations were made. The investigating authorities are requested to consider securing this video material.
At this meeting, several employees of the UNYTED/Fintery structure appeared and gave the impression that they were the team that would:
- create the token and technically perform the tokenization
- handle marketing and distribution
- create and market video productions
- manage investor relations and financial planning
- direct project management
The workshop agenda covered two full days (10:00–17:00) plus a "Barbecue" on the evening of April 14. The following persons were demonstrably involved:
| Person | Role at Kick-Off | Actual Delivery Afterward |
|---|---|---|
| Florian Krüger | Facilitator / CEO | None. On 04.25 the Slack channel went silent. |
| David Rehnström | Marketing / Cameraman | No performance. Afterward only manipulation and blame-shifting. |
| Tijana Trifunovic | Project Management / Notes | No demonstrable project control after the meeting. |
| Saskia Kurzbuch | Admin / Content | No content, no sales material created. |
| Dr. Maxine Room CBE | Investor Relations (announced) | No investor referral, no apparent contribution. |
| Alyona (Dovhosheia) | Financial Support | No financial planning delivered. |
| Witness: Mike Keul | Present as witness | Can testify to the meeting and representations. |
Assessment (Opinion): In the injured party's view, the Kick-Off Workshop of April 14–15, 2025 gave the appearance of a professional project launch. It is documented, however, that no single performance was delivered after this meeting. The Slack channel went silent on April 25, 2025 – just 10 days after the workshop. Whether the UNYTED employees present had knowledge of the circumstances documented here is not clarified. The presumption of innocence applies to all named persons.
Changing Job Titles – A Pattern of Deception
Particularly striking is that the same persons appeared in different contexts with different titles – apparently as needed for each respective staging:
- Tijana Trifunovic: "Production Manager" (UNYTED) → "Head of Project Management" (Fintery) – two fundamentally different roles
- Saskia Kurzbuch: "Marketing & Sales Content Creator" (UNYTED) → "Head of Sales" (Fintery) – from content creation to sales leadership
- Florian Krüger: "CEO & Founder" (UNYTED) → "CEO" (Fintery) → "CEO" (DEXPO Space) → Director of 6 UK companies simultaneously
This pattern of changing titles suggests, in the injured party's view, that the persons were flexibly deployed for various stagings – possibly to create the impression to different business partners of a team specialized for each purpose.
False Compliance Claims on the UNYTED Website
In the footer of the UNYTED website, the following compliance badges were prominently placed:
- MiCA Badge (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) – In reality, no demonstrable MiCAR approval exists with any EU authority
- GDPR Badge – Data protection compliance not verifiable, imprint and privacy statement do not comply with requirements
- DORA Badge (Digital Operational Resilience Act) – Applies to regulated financial enterprises; UNYTED is not a regulated financial enterprise
- MIT License Badge – Suggests open-source transparency, no publicly accessible code present
- Corporate LiveWire Innovation & Excellence Awards 2024 Winner – Verifiability unclear
The placement of these badges without demonstrable basis represents, in the injured party's view, another form of deception that exploits the trust of potential investors and business partners.
Guido Abraham and the Equitycom Commission Structure
Another striking detail from the document analysis: Guido Abraham, Managing Director of Equitycom, received a 50% commission on UNYT Token sales according to available information. Such a commission structure is unusual for serious financial products and resembles multi-level marketing (MLM) structures.
Furthermore, it was found that the UNYT Token was technically not processed via the blockchain, but by SEPA transfer and certificate – without real wallet integration. This stands in direct contradiction to the blockchain capabilities advertised on the website.
Unresolved Issues Regarding UNYTED Employees
The following points have not yet been clarified and would be relevant for a complete resolution of the matter. The named persons are expressly not accused – it is possible that they themselves were deceived about the true nature of the company:
- It is unclear whether the team members listed on the website had knowledge that the UNYT Token on the blockchain shows 0 Transfers and only 1 Holder.
- It is not documented whether the team members were informed of the missing FCA registration, although an "EU Crypto Licence" was claimed on the website.
- It is not known whether all listed persons actually performed the stated roles or whether possibly photos and names were used without full knowledge of the company's business practices.
- The actual role of persons present at the Kick-Off Workshop on April 14–15, 2025 and the extent of their knowledge of UNYTED's business practices have not been clarified.
- It is possible that team members were themselves deceived by Florian Krüger about the true nature of the company.
Notice: Should any of the named persons determine that their name or image was used without their knowledge to represent a non-existent team, this could constitute a separate criminal offense. The injured party explicitly encourages in this case to also file a report and to contact the investigating authorities as a witness. Contact information can be found at the end of this page.
Legal Notice: The representation of UNYTED team members is based on the publicly accessible website unyted.world/en/team/ (archived 07.14.2025) as well as documents from the Kick-Off Workshop. The presumption of innocence applies to all named persons. The assessments represent the opinion of the injured party. The final clarification of roles and responsibilities rests with the competent investigating authorities.
XIV. Recognizing Warning Signs – Are You Also Affected?
If you have been or are in contact with the mentioned persons or companies, watch out for the following warning signs that appeared in the documented case:
⚠ Changing Corporate Identities
The project was negotiated under the name DEXPO.Space, the invoice came from Fintery Ltd, the money landed at UNYTED Ltd. The constantly changing company names make tracking difficult.
⚠ Claimed Teams That Never Appear
There is talk of large teams (30–35 people), but after payment no one is reachable. Work channels remain empty, promised contacts do not exist or know nothing.
⚠ Staged Payments to Circumvent Controls
If your business partner suggests splitting payments into "bite-sized chunks" to "avoid triggering warnings," be extremely cautious.
⚠ Unrealistic Return Promises
Promises of 100 million euros, 4 billion in fund value, or "caviar with Bill Gates" have no place in serious business communication.
⚠ Aggressive Reaction to Confrontation
Instead of solutions, responses follow like "do what you want," "you're acting crazy," or "then do your thing."
⚠ Use of Third Party Names Without Their Knowledge
Serious companies do not present their partners without their consent. If references and team members are not reachable, something is wrong.
⚠️ Nested Money Flows
When investor funds are channeled through third-party companies (e.g., Equitycom) with 50% commission, and collected funds are spent before any service is provided.
⚠️ Evidence Obstruction After Confrontation
When YouTube channels, websites, or communication channels are deleted immediately after raising fraud allegations – a strong indication of guilty conscience.
⚠️ Zero Technical Questions at Project Handover
An alleged expert team that takes over a complex tokenization project but does not ask a single regulatory, technical, or economic question.
NEW: UNYT Token – On-Chain Analysis Reveals Total Loss for All Investors
UNYT Token: 1 Billion Tokens, 1 Holder, 0 Transfers
The smart contract of the UNYT Token on the Binance Smart Chain (0xcd04D9d4069252a3ECfC8AD941691D09eBB0173f) contains 1 billion tokens – not 210 million as communicated. There is only one single holder and there has never been a transfer on the blockchain. The token price is $0.00.
This means: Not a single investor has ever actually received a token on the blockchain. All "token sales" were SEPA transfers against worthless certificates.
210 million tokens × €1.25 issuance price. ScamAdviser Trust Score: 0/100. No FCA registration. No MiCAR approval. Complaints filed with BaFin, FCA, FMA Liechtenstein, and ESMA.
Read Complete UNYT Token Analysis →On the basis of this research, formal complaints were filed with five regulatory authorities:
- BaFin – Suspicion of unauthorized financial services, violation of VermAnlG and MiCAR
- FCA (UK) – Report of Unauthorised Firm, MLR 2017, FSMA, Fraud Act 2006
- FMA Liechtenstein – Review of Floin listing (VASP Reg. 329177) and TVTG compliance
- ESMA (EU) – Cross-border MiCAR violations, Art. 59, Art. 6, Art. 7
- Supplementary Criminal Complaint – §263 StGB (fraud), §54 KWG, §17 VermAnlG, §261 StGB
→ Complete UNYT Token Analysis with all On-Chain Data, Damage Estimation, and Regulatory Findings
Haben Sie ähnliche Erfahrungen gemacht?Have you had similar experiences?
If you have done business with David Rehnström, Florian Krüger, Fintery Ltd, UNYTED Ltd, DEXPO.Space or BUEHNENREIF Marketing, and recognize one of the following scenarios, your statement could be crucial:
- You were promised services that were never delivered
- You have made payments and are still waiting for a return
- You were presented with a large team or prominent partners that never showed up
- You were asked to stage payments to circumvent bank controls
- You were promised unrealistic returns
- When asked follow-up questions, you were dismissed, put off, or insulted
- You invested in the UNYT Token and cannot recover your investment or trade the token
Every additional statement strengthens ongoing investigations.
Your information will be treated strictly confidentially and can help clarify the situation – for you and for others.
Your message goes directly to M.H., Director. No data will be shared without your consent.
XV. Warum diese VeröffentlichungXV. Why This Publication
This documentation is made in the public interest and serves to protect potential additional victims. The publication is based on the fundamental right of freedom of expression (Art. 5 para. 1 GG) and the legitimate public interest in clarifying allegedly fraudulent business practices in the field of crypto tokenization.
It is the publisher's belief that the documented events are not an isolated case. The accused have a network of companies (Fintery, UNYTED, DEXPO.Space, BUEHNENREIF Marketing) and, in the publisher's view, exploit the complexity of tokenization services and their customers' lack of knowledge to obtain payments for which there is no real consideration. The investigative analysis of the UNYT Token has also shown that Krüger's UNYTED LIMITED ran a token project in parallel that has no regulatory basis and in which all investors lost their money – which, in the publisher's view, may be considered a possible motive for the fraud documented here. Anyone who has had similar experiences – whether with tokenization services or with the UNYT Token – is asked to come forward.
The accused are free to defend themselves against the allegations raised here – either through a counter-statement on this page, an out-of-court settlement, or through legal action. The extensive evidence available to the competent authorities in Germany and England speaks a clear language, in the conviction of the injured party.
XVI. KontaktXVI. Contact
Injured Party
████████ LTD
[Address protected]
[Location protected]
Director: M.H.
Contact: Open contact form
Attorney (Germany): RA Klaus G. Kerkhoff, Fabritiusstraße 8, 47829 Krefeld
Solicitor (England): Clintons, London (Gareth Jones)
If you have had similar experiences with the mentioned persons or companies, please use the contact form. Your information will be treated confidentially and can help support ongoing investigations.
IX. Interaktive BeweisdatenbankIX. Interactive Evidence Database
Jede Behauptung. Jeder Beweis. Jede Quelle. Vollständig dokumentiert und nachprüfbar.Every claim. Every proof. Every source. Fully documented and verifiable.
Beweisketten-MatrixEvidence Chain Matrix
How the evidence items are interconnected and reinforce each other
- BW-001 Initial Contact
- BW-002 Krüger = CEO Claim
- BW-004 Reconfirmation of CEO
- BW-008 YouTube: Krüger as CEO
- BW-009 Imprint Confirmed
- BW-017 Baykal Contradicts
- BW-005 Proposal DEXPO Logo
- BW-006 Identical Proposal Fintery Logo
- BW-007 Invoice €250,000
- BW-013 Let's Go Email with Team
- BW-014 Kickoff London
- BW-015 Ehrbar Knew Nothing
- BW-016 Empty Slack Channel
- BW-010 Staging Recommended
- BW-011 Unrealistic Promises
- BW-012 Trust Strategy Revealed
- BW-018 Denial of Deception
- BW-019 Gaslighting
- BW-020 Refusal
- BW-021 Fintery Ltd Registry
- BW-022 UNYTED Ltd Registry
- BW-007 Payment to Fintery
Source Type Legend
Detailed Profile Pages
Complete dossiers for all documented persons – with LinkedIn verification, role in the network, and documented participation in the deception.